I am the autodidact. Well, I am a autodict, but not necessarily the autodidact. Hopefully, even equally lonely, i'm the less deceived. But am I the less deceived? And if he has mauvais foi, I at least have a mauvaise foie. It parties w/out, a force of nature. And I shatter PNC by neither wanting nor not wanting to be there. The autodidact, in a tent of prisoners of war crowded together is at his happiest. For then, at their lowest, they are his equal. And by the transitivity of identity, I am a group of prisoners of war. But it's absurd to suggest i'm a group of prisoners of war. Therefore i'm not an autodidact. BUT, does it follow from my being the autodidact that I shatter PNC? If so, my not being the autodidact could really shore up logic. I'll take it; the set of premises 1) i'm the autodidact 2) I don't want to be in or not in are inconsistent, and not because 2) is contradictory in classical logic.
This is a timewasting way of saying i'm alone.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment